Schulte Table Average Time: Quartenson 5×5 Result Data

Quartenson 5×5 result distribution

This table shows aggregate completion-time percentiles from 1,000+ matching Quartenson 5×5 rounds. It is designed to help you place a result in the correct mode, not to assign a score to a person. The figures refresh as eligible new results are aggregated.

The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles describe the distribution of matching Quartenson results. Lower time is faster; compare only within the same mode and setup.

Why Classic and Dynamic times are not comparable

Classic mode keeps the number layout stable throughout the round. Dynamic mode changes number positions after each correct selection, requiring renewed visual search on every tap. The observed medians therefore differ by design, not by a simple level of skill.

Use the same mode, grid size, device, and input method when tracking your own change. A 14-second Classic result and a 31-second Dynamic result do not belong on the same personal average.

For the mechanics in more detail, read Classic vs Dynamic Schulte Tables.

How to compare your own result

Use this article as a method guide, not a ranking table.

1. Keep the same mode and 5×5 grid.
2. Use the same device and input method where possible.
3. Record several completed rounds and compare a median or typical result.
4. Read mistakes alongside time; a clean round is easier to compare.
5. Compare a recent matched set with your own earlier baseline.

Start with the free Schulte table trainer, then use the beginner Schulte table guide to establish a repeatable setup.

Methodology and limitations

This is a product-data summary, not a survey or clinical study.

• Source: Quartenson aggregate completion data for matching 5×5 rounds.
• Included: completed valid number-grid results with a recorded Classic or Dynamic mode.
• Classic keeps the grid stable; Dynamic shuffles positions after each correct selection. The modes are aggregated and displayed separately.
• The table uses the 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile of completion time. Lower time is faster.
• Mistakes remain part of the recorded result and should be reviewed beside time when comparing personal rounds.
• Results are influenced by device, input method, layout, experience, and the exact implementation. Aggregate figures can change as new matching completions are added.

Use Quartenson aggregates as context for a matching setup, then rely on your own repeated sessions to evaluate personal progress. They are not a universal average, public ranking, or diagnostic measure.

Schulte table average-time FAQ

Check your 5×5 result

Complete a matching 5×5 round to see your result in context. Each eligible anonymous completion can also help Quartenson improve the mode-specific benchmark over time.